Subject: Re: VIA C7 CPU and crypto capabilities SOLVED partially
To: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
From: Heron Gallegos <gallegos@csxxi.net.mx>
List: current-users
Date: 06/30/2007 16:19:50
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Juan RP wrote:
>> Now, the files are patched, but CPUVENDOR_VIA is undefined in
>> identcpu.c
>>
>> I supose CPUVENDOR_VIA is needed in arch/x86/include/cputypes.h
>>
>> /*
>> * CPU vendors
>> */
>>
>> #define CPUVENDOR_UNKNOWN -1
>> #define CPUVENDOR_INTEL 0
>> #define CPUVENDOR_CYRIX 1
>> #define CPUVENDOR_NEXGEN 2
>> #define CPUVENDOR_AMD 3
>> #define CPUVENDOR_IDT 4
>> #define CPUVENDOR_TRANSMETA 5
>>
> Try adding:
>
> #define CPUVENDOR_VIA 8
>
> Let me know if that works and I'll commit.
Juan: thanks for your help.
I am having some difficults in order to test your patch:
1) The cpu_vendor variable used for "C7 Esther" family is 0x4
2) The following lines of your code: (end of identcpu.c)
if (rdmsr(MSR_MISC_ENABLE) & (1 << 16)) {
if (cpu_vendor == CPUVENDOR_INTEL)
est_init(CPUVENDOR_INTEL);
if (cpu_vendor == CPUVENDOR_VIA)
est_init(CPUVENDOR_VIA);
if I have previous initialized ACE, rdmsr returns 0x100400,
if not, then rdmsr returns 0x110400 and I got the message:
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU
3) To initialize ACE (function via_cpu_probe() in identcpu.c)
the functions rdmsr() and wrmsr() are used:
msr = rdmsr(MSR_VIA_ACE);
wrmsr(MSR_VIA_ACE, msr | MSR_VIA_ACE_ENABLE);
at this point, msr receives the value "0x9f1f1ac5"
these value seems very very rare (for me).
maybe this number is my problem.
Thanks again, Juan
Heron Gallegos
Saltillo Coahuila Mexico