Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)

To: "Quentin Garnier" <cube%cubidou.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)
From: "Doom Warrior" <doomwarriorx%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:33:31 +0100

> I believe the E4500 that was referred to was that one:
>
>  http://www.sun.com/servers/midrange/e4500/

yes of course "Enterprise 4500" aka E4500

Best Regards
Stephan

References:
- sparc smp
  - From: Andrew Doran
- Re: sparc smp
  - From: Steven Grunza
- Re: sparc smp
  - From: Michael Lorenz
- Re: sparc smp
  - From: Doom Warrior
- E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)
  - From: Vincent
- Re: E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)
  - From: Quentin Garnier

Prev by Date: Re: E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)
Next by Date: Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
Previous by Thread: Re: E4500 SMP (was: Re: sparc smp)
Next by Thread: Re: sparc[64] smp
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index