Re: problem w/ libm on vax

["Michael L. Hitch" <mhitch%lightning.msu.montana.edu@localhost>]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Matthias Drochner wrote:

> I'd also suggest to remove the "cabs" entry in n_cabs.S.
> Perhaps I'm missing some detail of the build process, but
> don't you get two "cabs" definitions now, the other one in
> compat_cabs?

  The compat files are added to COMMON_SRCS, which is not used for vax
(that's how the vax build worked when you first added the complex 
routines;  they were added to COMMON_SRCS).

--
Michael L. Hitch                        mhitch%montana.edu@localhost
Computer Consultant
Information Technology Center
Montana State University        Bozeman, MT     USA