Re: CPU recognition changes: much less information

[Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:18:00PM +0100, Andrew Doran wrote:

> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> 
> > Updating from 4.99.61 to 4.99.62/amd64 gave me:
> > -cpu0 at mainbus0 apid 0: (boot processor)
> > -cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+, 2210.30 MHz
> > -cpu0: features efdbfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR>
> > -cpu0: features efdbfbff<PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MPC,NOX,MMXX,MMX>
> > -cpu0: features efdbfbff<FXSR,SSE,SSE2,RDTSCP,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW>
> > -cpu0: features2 2001<SSE3,CX16>
> > -cpu0: I-cache 64 KB 64B/line 2-way, D-cache 64 KB 64B/line 2-way
> > -cpu0: L2 cache 512 KB 64B/line 16-way
> > -cpu0: ITLB 32 4 KB entries fully associative, 8 4 MB entries fully 
> > associative
> > -cpu0: DTLB 32 4 KB entries fully associative, 8 4 MB entries fully 
> > associative
> > -cpu0: Initial APIC ID 0
> > +cpu0 at mainbus0 apid 0: IDT/VIA 686-class, 2210MHz, id 0x40ff2
> >  cpu0: AMD Power Management features: 3f<STC,TM,TTP,VID,FID,TS>
> > -cpu0: calibrating local timer
> > -cpu0: apic clock running at 201 MHz
> >  cpu0: 8 page colors
> > 
> > I think I prefer the previous output :)
> > In particular, "IDT/VIA 686-class" doesn't tell me much at all.
> 
> You can get the same information with "cpuctl identify 0" now. However, it
> recognises it as an IDT/VIA chip instead of an AMD one. That is completely
> wrong, I will investigate.

Ok, it will say AMD again.

Andrew