Re: WAPBL on multicore, 1 (ONE!) process...

["Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:44:28PM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:22:31AM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > Quoting from the PR addition I wrote:
> > 
> >   I've repeated this experiment on a non-wapbl file system on the same
> >   system, but there the difference was in the "sync loop" disfavour:
> > 
> >   5799.240u 2232.222s 24:57.93 536.1%     0+0k 494+710112io 32612pf+0w
> >   vs.
> >   5881.837u 2435.640s 27:14.19 508.9%     0+0k 0+720501io 32646pf+0w
> > 
> Oh ok. So it's just a mere 15% worse. Hey, why are you complaining:)

I'm officially blind. I should go unsober and stay away from my
mail account for today. Apologies. I'm still seeing quite a worse
ratio though.

-Martin