Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: i386 and the COMPAT_50 option
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 01:14:16PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02:40AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
>
> > (fwiw, we really really should completely drop e.g. COMPAT_43 ioctls)
>
> Isn't it likely that foreign binaries (Ultrix/SunOS) know about them?
Yes. Even our own X11 code used to know about them -- I think that's
finally gone now.
Ultrix may be a special case but all anything else cares about from
COMPAT_43 is the old tty interface.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon
tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost
"Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index