Re: dspam problem

[Adrian Portelli <adrianp%stindustries.net@localhost>]

On 30/04/2009 13:01, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
> Martti Kuparinen wrote:
> 
>> _hash_drv_seek (N is random, small number) because hash_rec_max
>> becomes zero and at the same time "header" changes to something else
>> than it was previously.
>>
>>
>>   fpos = sizeof(struct _hash_drv_header) +
>>     ((hashcode % header->hash_rec_max) * sizeof(struct
>> _hash_drv_spam_record));
> 
> Someone else has had same problems...
> 
> http://dspam.irontec.com/dspam-users/0772.html
> 

I know this doesn't *help* you but wasn't the hash driver depreciated ?

adrian.