At Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:57:20 +0900, Curt Sampson <cjs%netbsd.org@localhost>
wrote:
Subject: Re: git copies of cvs modules available
>
> My point was, in terms of dealing with branches, the distance between
> CVS and Subversion is significantly greater than that between Subversion
> and Git. Git offers more convenience in merging (at the expense of a
> rather steeper learning curve), though Subversion has recently added
> some merge tracking features that fix the worst of the merge issues.
This is just a quick off-the cuff question I have about SVN that's
slightly related to this thread.
Do the newer merge tracking features for SVN you mention solve some/all
of the issues raised in this post from 2006?
http://changelog.complete.org/archives/528-whose-distributed-vcs-is-the-most-distributed
Some of the comments made to this post are quite interesting too.
--
Greg A. Woods
Planix, Inc.
<woods%planix.com@localhost> +1 416 218 0099 http://www.planix.com/
Attachment:
pgpw2uGAPhF64.pgp
Description: PGP signature