Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?

To: Nicolas Joly <njoly%pasteur.fr@localhost>
Subject: Re: pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?
From: Klaus Klein <kleink%kleink.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:47:42 +0200

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:44:51PM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:

> It seems that _PC_NO_TRUNC description from pathconf(2) man page is
> wrong/inverted:
> 
>      _PC_NO_TRUNC
>              Return 1 if filenames longer than {NAME_MAX} are truncated.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Could someone confirm that the man page is wrong ?

It is.


- Klaus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?
  - From: Nicolas Joly

References:
- pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?
  - From: Nicolas Joly

Prev by Date: daily CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: unable to cross-compile sparc64 on i386 host
Previous by Thread: pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?
Next by Thread: Re: pathconf(2) _PC_NO_TRUNC wrong description ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index