Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc

To: current-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:27:19 +0200

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:16:20PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> > Hm - while tcsh(1) is the root shell, booting to single-user would not
> > touch it, right?
> 
> It is not tcsh specific (exact conditions are unclear though)

The problem is that some binaries (tcsh most noticable) only contain
executable segments now. One of them is read-only, the other writeable.

Joerg

References:
- 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
  - From: Hauke Fath
- Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
  - From: Hauke Fath
- Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
Next by Date: Re: NetBSD 5.0.2 issues with Realtek Gigabit
Previous by Thread: Re: 5.99.39 sbrk() fails on sparc
Next by Thread: daily CVS update output
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index