Re: Build break - commaizenumber

[Eric Haszlakiewicz <erh%nimenees.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:05:03PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:54:58AM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:23:38AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > >What's wrong with %'<format>?
> > > Nothing!  :)
> > > 
> > > IMHo, the commaize_number changes including those in ls(1) should be 
> > > backed out.
> > 
> > Why should the change to ls be backed out?  Is there something wrong with
> > displaying the sizes with commas?
> 
> The libc part should be reverted and a proper interface be added. I
> don't really care about ls -M.

Ok, I'm going to undo the addition of commaize_number, and change ls to
use the printf format instead.

eric