Re: xl or xm for xen ? (and more questions, maybe raidframe related)

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:09:06PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>     Date:        Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:29:13 +0100
>     From:        Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
>     Message-ID:  <20131202112913.GA892%asim.lip6.fr@localhost>
> 
>   | > But, the xendomains script has "REQUIRE: xend" in it ??
>   | I think this is a leftover from previous versions.
> 
> OK, so to use xl, I should have xend=NO in rc.conf ?

yes

> (the require stuff is just for ordering the script, it doesn't care
> if the daemon is actually started - I know you know that, but all this
> mail gets archived, so ...)
>  
>   | Yes, because before 4.2 xm is unusable. Even with Xen 4.2, there are
>   | missing features in the xl toolstack.
> 
> I know you mean xl there, and I understand - but if I don't know what
> features I'm missing, having never used xm, is there anything that would
> really be a disaster because it isn't there yet?

no

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--