Re: New 'config' pulls in undesired subsystems

[Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>]

Sorry, that "no wsdisplay" was my future _plan_, not suggestion.  It
doesn't work yet.

I'm really impressed by people's craftmanship to reduce kernel size by
enumerating uncountable "no" options.  But I want to make it much
simpler and easier to use.  I hope you will not complain.

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:15 PM, John D. Baker <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost> wrote:
> Un-modularizing wscons via this commit:
>
>   http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2014/10/17/msg059544.html
>
> fixed the issue for my sparc custom kernels.  Prior to that, I'd tried
> what was suggested in the commit message, but it appears that if one
> uses an enumerator one must also specify the attachment.  So,
>
>   no wsdisplay*
>
> causes 'config' to complain about "unknown attachment" while
>
>   no wsdisplay
>
> was accepted (but failed to exclude wsdisplay).
>
> --
> |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS               NetBSD     Darwin/MacOS X
> |\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com    OpenBSD            FreeBSD
> | X  No HTML/proprietary data in email.   BSD just sits there and works!
> |/ \ GPGkeyID:  D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4  BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645
>