Re: rump and htonl() in constants

To: Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: rump and htonl() in constants
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:16:11 -0500

On Feb 28,  5:46pm, prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost (Patrick Welche) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: rump and htonl() in constants

| Yes - I have DBG=-g -O0 in Makefile.rump
| 
| I thought that would help trying to step through a rump kernel in gdb - not
| a good idea? (removing now)
| 
| I suppose that is why no one else is seeing this...

We could make this compile by adding an ifdef __OPTIMIZE__...

christos

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rump and htonl() in constants
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Re: rump and htonl() in constants
  - From: Patrick Welche

Prev by Date: Re: rump and htonl() in constants
Next by Date: Re: DoS attack against TCP services
Previous by Thread: Re: rump and htonl() in constants
Next by Thread: Re: rump and htonl() in constants
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index