Hi Alan On 2015-04-13 06:54, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:I can confirm that this patch works on my tun device (carrying ipv6 inside ipv4).This patch is not sufficient for my IPv6 tunnel.
...
This is on an i386 system, running a kernel from 2015-04-07 00:00 UTC (with the one line patch to route.c that Roy posted), but with userland from 2015-01-27 00:00 UTC. A kernel from 2015-01-27 00:00 UTC does not have this problem.
Can you discard the prior patches from Robert myself and just apply the latest one I posted please - it affects more than just route.c NOTE - this patch ONLY affects local route creation for the address assigned to the interface, it has zero to do with the default route or anything else.
Roy