Re: swwdog pseudo device

[Paul Goyette <paul%vps1.whooppee.com@localhost>]

Found the answer in my own commit from 4+ years ago:

	Convert swwdog(4) from a simple defpseudo device to a defpseudodev
	so that we can attach a power management handler.  The handler
	prevents a suspend if the watchdog is active, to be consistent
	with other watchdog drivers.

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:

> Does anyone know if there is a need for swwdog to be a "defpseudodev swwdog" 
> rather than the simpler "defpseudo swwdog" ?
>
> I'd like to modularize the swwdog driver, and things would be so much cleaner 
> to use defpseudo.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
> | (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com    |
> | Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
> | Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
| (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com    |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------