Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: time for MKDTRACE=yes for some ports?



Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:01:22PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> 
>> Jeff Rizzo <riz%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:
>> 
>> > I propose to enable MKDTRACE by default for the following ports:
>> >
>> > amd64
>> > i386
>> > (some subset of?) arm
>> >
>> > It's made a lot of progress, recently, and will be easier to work on
>> > going forward with it on by default in places where it works.  I'm not
>> > currently proposing to enable KDTRACE_HOOKS in GENERIC, but we might
>> > want to start thinking about that.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?  I'd like to do this next week sometime.
>> 
>> If you do this, and do a full build and an anita run, are there any
>> regressions?
>
> It just installs additional files, so as long as the set lists are ok,
> I can't imagine test breakage.

I can't particularly, but actually running the tests seems like good
practice...


Attachment: pgp48X7w4ZujN.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index