Re: Revert CTF/DTRACE? (was: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure)

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Feb 11,  6:25am, paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Revert CTF/DTRACE?  (was: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-curren

| Obviously, this should have been cc'd to <christos at netbsd.org> and 
| not to <christos at whooppee.com>  :)
| 
| On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
| 
| > Perhaps we should revert the commit that made CTF/DTRACE on by default? At 
| > least then we could continue testing everything else?  (Of course, once we 
| > figure out and fix the problem with nbctfmerge, we would re-enable DTRACE...)
| >
| > It seems to me that we're losing a lot more functionality by not having the 
| > automated build-and-test systems running as compared to losing 
| > DTRACE-and-CTF-by-default.

Sure, but it is puzzling because autobuild works and I have not seen it
stuck on my hosts... What's different about the build-n-test framework?

christos