Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> For example, I would use nsd on exactly one machine in my environment,
> my public facing DNS server which is exactly where it belongs.
> 
> On the other hand, all my other BSD machines run unbound as a local
> caching resolver.

To slightly expand that. You don't need nsd if you just want to serve a
few local host names for a local network. You only need nsd if you want
to provide an authoritive DNS server. IMO that is a decently small use
case that it doesn't justify the incluse into the base system.

Joerg