Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: npf related panic
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:37:32PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20170104185302.GB5015@quark>,
> Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:52:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >> On Jan 4, 3:45pm, prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost (Patrick Welche) wrote:
> >> -- Subject: Re: npf related panic
> >>
> >> | npf seems blameless: see John Baker's message - we have the same stack trace
> >> | below pfil_run_addrhooks. (amd64 stack trace has pfil.c 1.30, the
> >RPI probably
> >>
> >> Can you add a check printing:
> >>
> >> printf("npf=%p ifa=%p\n", npf, ifa);
> >> npf_ifaddr_sync(npf, ifa->ifa_ifp);
> >>
> >> in src/sys/netinet/npf/npf_os.c in the address hook function?
> >
> >npf=0xfffffe81162fe7d0 ifa=0x0
> >
> >sure enough... null ifa...
>
> Should be fixed...
Thanks! (RPI images good too...)
P
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index