Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <23364.1512023611%andromeda.noi.kre.to@localhost>,
Robert Elz  <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> wrote:
>    Date:        Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:48:22 +0000 (UTC)
>    From:        NetBSD Test Fixture <bracket%NetBSD.org@localhost>
>    Message-ID:  <151192370231.10146.3070298657628695114%babylon5.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>
>  | The newly failing test case is:
>  |     lib/libc/locale/t_strfmon:strfmon
>
>I have been looking into this new test failure, and I believe I
>have convinced myself that the test is simply wrong - it is testing
>for what was a bug in our previous strfmon() function, which has
>recently been corrected.
>
>So I plan on updating the test to test the output that should appear
>(from my reading of what the posix spec for strfmon requires) rather
>than what happened to appear in the past.
>
>I will also fix a piece of utter nonsense (obvious nonsense) in the
>man page, but that's a less important issue (most people reading it
>would notice that what it says cannot be what it means, and they'd
>be right.)

Sorry, I forgot to fix the test; yes the previous test was wrong
and the current output is correct.

christos