Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Intel CPU design flaw
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
Any comments in this part of the wood about
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/02/intel_cpu_design_flaw/ ?
I have one. In my world, performance > security. I don't fully understand
the internals of the issue. It sounds like some kind of MMU hardware flaw
that can't be patched with microcode. The chosen fix appears to be some
kind of more software-slanted memory protection.
Nonetheless, as a user, can I get this as an *option* instead of forced
down my throat? I didn't pay for my CPUs to turn off a third of it's
performance. Ie..
"TAKE_A_BIG_PERFORMANCE_HIT_BECAUSE_SECURITY=true"
That's my only real comment other than "this really sucks for all of us
and I hope Intel's stock tanks accordingly." I just spent the last year
learning assembler. I'm glad it was 68k not x86.
-Swift
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index