Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support

To: Rin Okuyama <rokuyama%rk.phys.keio.ac.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:11:22 +0200

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:32:21PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've confirmed sysinst(8) with and without this option works on amd64.
> > 
> > Go for it.
> 
> Thanks, committed! How about this?

Can you please give a bit more time before such changes?
I am working on huge diffs to sysinst and this is a nightmare of a merge.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
  - From: Rin Okuyama

References:
- small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
  - From: Rin Okuyama
- Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
  - From: Rin Okuyama

Prev by Date: Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
Next by Date: Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
Previous by Thread: Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
Next by Thread: Re: small sysinst(8) without extended partitioning support
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index