On 01.06.2019 11:51, Robert Elz wrote: > Does anyone know of any reason that would not work? Or have any objections > to moving in that direction? (After NetBSD-9 is branched). > I would try to consul this with pooka@, even if he is inactive. The selling point of rump was that it was sliced into parts and it was feasible to pick only specific subsystem and write tiny code on top of that (actually as tiny as not much beyond 0.5-1MB). There were speculations whether this could be achieved with LTO, but when I last checked it was just a research idea. > kre >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature