Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ACPI changes in -current, -10 vs. kernels w/o "genfb"
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:46:27AM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> The following change in -current:
>
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/10/16/msg148163.html
>
> and its subsequent pull-up to netbsd-10:
>
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/10/18/msg148226.html
>
> breaks building kernels which exclude "genfb". The failure is as follows:
>
> [...]
> # link VERTHANDI/netbsd
> /r0/build/netbsd-10/tools/amd64/bin/i486--netbsdelf-ld -Map netbsd.map --cref -T netbsd.ldscript -Ttext c0100000 -e start -X -o netbsd ${SYSTEM_OBJ:[@]:Nswapnetbsd.o} ${EXTRA_OBJ} vers.o swapnetbsd.o
> /r0/build/netbsd-10/tools/amd64/bin/i486--netbsdelf-ld: acpi_wakeup.o: in function `acpi_md_sleep_patch':
> /x/netbsd-10/src/sys/arch/x86/acpi/acpi_wakeup.c:145: undefined reference to `acpi_md_vesa_modenum'
> [...]
>
> I have machines with ACPI for which "genfb" (or any DRMKMS framebuffer)
> is superfluous and therefore are omitted from the configuration.
Hello,
should be fixed on HEAD, will request a pullup to netbsd-10
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index