On Mon 05 Feb 2024 at 10:18:09 +1100, matthew green wrote: > perhaps convert into a DBG(4, ...)? On Mon 05 Feb 2024 at 02:20:25 +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > May be make it reported only once, so that the message is still there > in the log, but it's not spammed uselessly, adding no new information? I think I like the second suggestion slightly better, so I'll go with that. I'll do a test build first, even though it seems trivial. I didn't do a build in a while anyway... -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert <rhialto/at/falu.nl> \X/ There is no AI. There is just someone else's work. --I. Rose
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature