Subject: Re: empirical method for generation of netbsd book.
To: Joel Reicher <joel@panacea.null.org>
From: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 09/24/1998 06:42:18
by homeworld.cygnus.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 1998 13:40:42 -0000
by polaris.garbled.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA05331;
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 06:42:19 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <XFMail.980924064218.root@garbled.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <199809241328.XAA03017@panacea.null.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 06:42:18 -0700 (MST)
Reply-To: root@garbled.net
Organization: garbled.net
From: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
To: Joel Reicher <joel@panacea.null.org>
Subject: Re: empirical method for generation of netbsd book.
Cc: netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG, Todd Whitesel <toddpw@best.com>
On 24-Sep-98 Joel Reicher spoke unto us all:
# > However, I think it makes a lot of sense to wait until 1.4-BETA is mostly
# > converged before we marshal the resources to actually do this.
#
# Why not start compiling a list of experiences now? Especially since there
# are some things that may not crop up in an installation party, such as the
# building and using of local shared libraries. Almost every newbie I speak
# to hits this and some are told to mess around with ldconfig, some are told
# to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH and some use (my preferred method) ld.so.conf.
I think waiting for 1.4 might be a mistake. As we all know.. releases can
take awhile, and we never really know when they are coming out. I think
writing something now, and updating a few minor nits for 1.4 would deliver
something alot quicker than starting after 1.4 goes into release cycle.
I also think a *really* good place to start would be to look at /usr/share/doc
and perhaps bring that up to date. Its a win for the tree even if nothing ever
gets published.
---
Tim Rightnour - root@garbled.net
Free Multi-Platform Operating System: http://www.netbsd.org
Get your official NetBSD-1.3.2 CDROM set today! http://www.netbsd.com/