Subject: Re: Something I noticed on the Yahoo site
To: Neil A. Carson <neil@causality.com>
From: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 12/10/1998 10:41:41
by homeworld.cygnus.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 1998 20:21:46 -0000
by polaris.garbled.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA15177;
Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:41:41 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <XFMail.981210104141.root@garbled.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <366F505E.161A19C8@causality.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:41:41 -0700 (MST)
Reply-To: root@garbled.net
Organization: garbled.net
From: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
To: "Neil A. Carson" <neil@causality.com>
Subject: Re: Something I noticed on the Yahoo site
Cc: netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org, Kevin Cousins <kevin.cousins@praxa.com.au>,
David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
On 10-Dec-98 Neil A. Carson spoke unto us all:
# Why do we believe in NetBSD?
Thats a very important question that we should be answering on the web page.
Cute little quotes like "solutions not hacks" might be good.
# To users, what does it offer over and above the competition?
This would be idealy done in a manner that doesn't degrade the competition. Ie:
We have USB, and linux doesn't. Is not an acceptable statement, just saying
"We have full USB support on a variety of architectures" is an open ended
statement that lets the users do their own research, and come to the above
conclusion. ;)
# Why should people choose NetBSD?
Things like "production quality OS", "reliable backwards compatibility" and
"stable kernel" might go nicely here..
---
Tim Rightnour - root@garbled.net
Free Multi-Platform Operating System: http://www.netbsd.org
NetBSD Mailing lists on the web: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/mlist