Subject: Re: Performance Computing article on old workstations
To: None <James.Spath@bdk.com>
From: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/03/1999 09:36:46
by homeworld.redbacknetworks.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 1999 16:36:55 -0000
by beer.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA16498;
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:36:47 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199902031636.JAA16498@beer.org>
To: James.Spath@bdk.com
Cc: NetBSD-Advocacy@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Performance Computing article on old workstations
From: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <16495.918059806.1@lager>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 09:36:46 -0700
James.Spath@bdk.com wrote:
> Performance Computing (FKA UNIX Review) has an article in the March 1999
> issue titled "Old Workstations Never Die." I was pleased to note that
> NetBSD was mentioned prominently. Figure 1 lists "Other available OSes"
> for architectures such as SPARCstation, Alpha, and BeBox. NetBSD is
> listed for 4 out of 7, although BeBox and NeXTStation were asterisked as
> under development. We missed SGI, HP and IBM boxes.
>
> My favorite quote was "You should keep an eye on Linux, NetBSD and
> OpenBSD."
Can you see if you can find a URL for that or get permission from them to
put it on the net and send it to www@netbsd.org to put in the "NetBSD in
the news" section of the webpage?