Subject: Re: seti & rc5-64
To: Jim McKim <mckim@bandersnatch.lerc.nasa.gov>
From: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/29/2000 09:26:20
Jim McKim <mckim@bandersnatch.lerc.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I'm not the diplomat to present this to the SETI@home group, but
> perhaps it should also be brought to their attention that some number
> of *BSD advocates are also in the position of deciding if SETI@home
> related traffic should be allowed through firewalls...
That would be moderately childish.