Subject: Re: seti & rc5-64
To: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
From: Jim McKim <mckim@bandersnatch.lerc.nasa.gov>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 03/01/2000 07:36:37
How about email like:
Hi, I work with the group that mandates network security
policy at -----. Recently, we have received a number of
requests to allow traffic supporting the SETI@home application
through the firewall. I would like the opportunity to evaluate
the application, to help our group make a decision about
allowing this traffic. I noted on the web site that the
platform I need to use for the evaluation (NetBSD/-----) is
not supported by the current SETI@home software. I'd
appreciate it if you could help me find a way to support this
architecture. If I can be of any assistance (compiling
binaries, for instance), please let me know. The SETI@home
project sounds exciting and I look forward to allowing our
user community to contribute to it.
I don't want to be overtly threatening, but just to plant the idea
that there may be some intangible benefits from supporting NetBSD.