On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:24 AM, Mirko Thiesen wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Cheponis wrote:
>>          On the other hand, no, Linux does not have that _stupid_ 
>> notion of
>>          having totally separate kernel development for different 
>> issues.  If
>>          you want a secure BSD, you get Open BSD; if you want a 
>> usable BSD, you
>>          get FreeBSD; and if you want BSD on other architectures, you 
>> get
>>          NetBSD.  That is just idiotic, to have different teams worry 
>> about
>>          different things.
>>
>>          In Linux, we aim for balanced development.  We do a lot of 
>> security,
>>          because people care about it, but we don't do it by ignoring 
>> other issues.
>>
> It's hard not to bash Linux when "Emperor Penguin" makes such a 
> statement. You would want to yell at him: "Ah, yes, and in NetBSD we 
> don't bother with stupid things like usability and security, because 
> if you want one of those, you can always get FreeBSD and OpenBSD. You 
> obviously understand how *BSD works."

Linus is just trolling... Nothing to see here, move along..