I find it interesting that the wording is shifting to calling NetBSD's
very real portability a "myth".  I doubt that that was intended that
way, but...

The appearance that I'm seeing is that people are embarrassed about a
real strength of NetBSD.  Note that I said "appearance"; this whole
thread about NetBSD's image boils down to appearances.  And the lists
are effectively published on the web.

Just a thought.  (^&

-- 
  "I probably don't know what I'm talking about."  http://www.olib.org/~rkr/