Subject: Re: Portability "myth"?
To: None <netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.org>
From: Leonardo Boiko <leoboiko@conectiva.com.br>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 01/13/2005 08:41:50
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigE2D71E472E20566CC099CA9E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tim Rightnour wrote:
> On 12-Jan-2005 Richard Rauch wrote:
>>I find it interesting that the wording is shifting to calling NetBSD's
>>very real portability a "myth".  I doubt that that was intended that
>>way, but...
> 
> I think what is meant, is that "portability is our best feature" is a myth.
> 

I think what is meant is that "portability is our only feature" is a myth.

There are people who think that NetBSD is good at portability and 
nothing else.  They don't know what they're losing 8)
-- 
Leonardo Boiko

--------------enigE2D71E472E20566CC099CA9E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB5myRzse6kja2B7QRAqOyAJ0YbASH9KmSlL4yj7whdzR3IGJ23ACeI/8Q
d1EOl0a4lZNkl359X9jjq6g=
=rIj3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigE2D71E472E20566CC099CA9E--