On 09:19, Tue 18 Oct 05, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> 
> >keep in mind that the priority for the NetBSD Project website is
> >accessibility, not eye candy.
> 
> I'd agree. But as it's presented (i.e., without, for the moment, taking
> into account usability on Lynx, my phone, etc.), the new idea for the
> site is more accessable. Here are some examples:
> 
>     * It's much easier to distinguish between the "news" area and the
>     "standard description" area; if you're familiar with the site,
>     you'll find the latest news headlines that you're looking for more
>     easily than you will on the current site.
> 
>     * Information of lesser importance to new visitors, such as how many
>     different languages our web site is available in, is hidden (by putting
>     it in a dropdown). Yet the fact that other languages are available is
>     still quite clear.
> 
>     * You're less likely to have to scroll to find an architecture you
>     want, yet the impressive display of them still very effectively
>     communicates a key feature of NetBSD: that it runs on a very large
>     number of architectures.
> 
> I could go on, but overall, this is a better piece of graphic design
> than our current site, in my opinion, and it's not about eye-candy.

Yeah,  me too. I'd love to see a process of it becoming NetBSD.org.
However, I think we need Jacak to show us an actual working design
we can view in our browsers. /me pokes Jacak.

-- 
		Liam J. Foy
		liamfoy@sepulcrum.org