Subject: NetBSD Security Advisory 1999-010
To: None <netbsd-announce@netbsd.org>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: netbsd-announce
Date: 05/21/1999 23:02:25
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

                 NetBSD Security Advisory 1999-010
                 =================================

Topic:		ARP table vulnerability
Version:	NetBSD-1.3*
Severity:	Denial of service or traffic hijacking from local network
		cable is possible


Abstract
========

The implementation of ARP packet reception is vulnerable two attacks:

	- on multihomed hosts, ARP packets from cable A can overwrite
	  ARP entries for cable B.

	- for all hosts, ARP packets can overwrite ARP entries marked
	  as static.


Technical Details
=================

ARP is a protocol used to dynamically obtain IPv4 to Link level address
translation, used for Ethernet, FDDI, Token ring, and ARCnet cables, 
described in RFC 826.

The first vulnerability is specific to hosts with more than one ARP capable
network attached.  The address information of incoming ARP packets is not 
checked to ensure that it corresponds to one of the addresses of the
interface on which the packet arrived.  Thus, it would be able to suppress
or redirect traffic from the attacked host to a different destination.

The second vulnerability is related to so-called "static" arp entries.
The original NetBSD ARP implementation (as that of most other vendors)
allows the creation of "static" or "permanent" ARP entries.  They are
typically used for two reasons:

	- as a security measure, to disallow the redirection of traffic
	  addressed to priviledged hosts by rogue hosts on the cable to
	  themselves or elsewhere,

	- as a cheap routing protocol ("proxy ARP"), mostly when
	  connecting single hosts through point to point links.  To the
	  outside, they occur as if they where on the (e.g.) Ethernet, but
	  traffic destined for them is redirected by the ARP mechanism to
	  the routing host.

The 2nd usage doesn't create specific denial of service possibilities as
the ARP protocol is insecure in itself.

However, if static ARP entries are used to prevent D.O.S. attacks, they need
to be protected from overwriting.


Solutions and Workarounds
=========================

NetBSD-1.4, and NetBSD-1.4_BETA after 1999-05-05, are fixed.

A patch is available for NetBSD 1.3.3 to fix this problem.  You may
find this patch on the NetBSD ftp server:

    ftp://ftp.NetBSD.ORG/pub/NetBSD/misc/security/patches/19990505-arp


NetBSD-current since 19990506 is not vulnerable.  Users of
NetBSD-current should upgrade to a source tree later than 19990506.



Thanks To
=========

Both vulnerabilities were reported by Olaf "Rhialto" Seibert in NetBSD
PR 7489 and PR 7490.  A fix was provided by Zdenek Salvet in PR 7497,
and integrated into NetBSD by Ignatios Souvatzis.


Revision History
================

	1999/05/21 - initial version


More Information
================

Information about NetBSD and NetBSD security can be found at
http://www.NetBSD.ORG/ and http://www.NetBSD.ORG/Security/.


Copyright 1999, The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.

$NetBSD: NetBSD-SA1999-010.txt,v 1.3 1999/05/21 12:47:00 mrg Exp $

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN0VV2j5Ru2/4N2IFAQHDLwQAht39y0fw6s9lve+8L+LDaH5LPDHXkj3X
YlPtGQAmqKOy/qf8sRbnHYQOm4uxmLpUv5KJznL37o5C8PvA/YZSU5Yq2S7Modkk
Po0fxKeacwwf6y4gkT3s6TNOl1W6vxg3P2Ruir6dRbC5FNS4G6PCboa4yUjA0pg2
MSU393S0GV8=
=b765
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----