i've applied your patch, but have a comment:

> >Fix:
> 
> *** 1.1	1995/01/02 23:42:06
> --- bsd.README	1995/01/02 23:43:14
> ***************
> *** 1,4 ****
> ! #	$NetBSD: bsd.README,v 1.7 1994/06/30 05:31:09 cgd Exp $
>   #	@(#)bsd.README	5.1 (Berkeley) 5/11/90
>   
>   This is the README file for the new make "include" files for the BSD
> --- 1,4 ----
> ! #	$Id: bsd.README,v 1.2 1995/01/02 23:43:13 jhawk Exp $
>   #	@(#)bsd.README	5.1 (Berkeley) 5/11/90
>   
>   This is the README file for the new make "include" files for the BSD

please don't include patches that include hunks like this.

We've been working (slowly) to get the entire tree to be converted
over to the $NetBSD$ id's, and we'd _really_ rather that normal $Id$'s
creep back in.

diffs like this only make life that much easier...


It's not clear what a good (completely automated) way to keep a local
version number, keep the NetBSD version number (for ID purposes), and
keep the two from mixing in the master source tree.  But i think it's
a bad idea to change the NetBSD version id in diffs you send back.



thanks,

chris