> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:41:58 -0600 (CST)
> From: Scott Reynolds <scottr@plexus.com>

> The problem that was reported is a valid one.  Some discussion has brought
> to light the fact that the DIRSIZ macro was never intended to be anything
> but ufs-specific.  I don't like this collision between the ufs DIRSIZ, the
> compat (<dir.h>) DIRSIZ, and now the dirent DIRSIZ definitions.
> 
> I'd like to propose that the DIRSIZ macro be renamed in <sys/dirent.h>, 
> in thise case, and change the two files that rely on this 
> (msdosfs_vnops.c and cd9660_vnops.c) to use this new macro, instead.
> I'd do it myself if I was clear on all of the ramifications...

That sounds reasonable.  The name DIRENT_SIZE makes some sense.

Gordon