>From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
>Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 17:17:44 -0800

>On Mon, 18 Mar 1996 16:09:39 -0600 (CST) 
> Scott Reynolds <scottr@Plexus.COM> wrote:
>
[I spewed:]
> > > It's only manifesting on the hp300 because only the hp300 is using old
> > > config.
> > 
> > Yes, but the argument is that it ought not to have manifested itself 
> > _at_all_.
>
>Exactly.

OK.  This makes a bit more sense to me now.  Your point is that MI
code should not depend on config-generated files, correct?

> > > Why is the hp300 port still using the old config, anyway?
>
>It's not as easy as you might think :-)  (Plus, I need to have *some* 
>time leftover for the pub.. :-)

[long litany of woe deleted]

Impressive.  Definitely leave time for the pub. :-)
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>     <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA       (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil