Hubert Feyrer writes:

>df: -l or -t does not make sense with list of mount points

I fail to see the logic behind why an implicit list of mount points is
OK with -l or -t but an explicit list isn't.

I'd say, make df behave the same for -l or -t whether an explicit list
of mount points is given as arguments or not.  In fact, this could be
handy if you want to check the same mounted filesystems on several
machines where you don't know beforehand which file system is mount
local or remote on any given machine.
-- 
Christoph Badura	bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org

You don't need to quote my .signature.  Everyone has seen it by now.
Besides, it doesn't add anything to the current thread.