Subject: misc/2946: uname -a doesn't seem to do what I expect
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: Peter Seebach <seebs@taniemarie.solon.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/16/1996 03:08:17
>Number: 2946
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: uname -a is not equivalent to uname -[many options]
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: misc-bug-people (Misc Bug People)
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sat Nov 16 01:20:01 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Peter Seebach
>Organization:
Peter Seebach - seebs@solon.com - Copyright 1996 Peter Seebach.
C/Unix wizard -- C/Unix questions? Send mail for help. No, really!
Unsolicited email is not welcome, and will be billed for at consulting rates.
The *other* C FAQ - http://www.solon.com/~seebs/c/c-iaq.html
>Release: 1.2
>Environment:
System: NetBSD taniemarie 1.2_BETA NetBSD 1.2_BETA (SEEBS) #0: Fri Aug 16 17:16:09 CDT 1996 seebs@taniemarie:/usr/src/sys/arch/amiga/compile/SEEBS amiga
>Description:
uname -a produces the output you see above, which is nigh unparsable.
>How-To-Repeat:
uname -a
>Fix:
I don't think '-v' should be implied by '-a'. I would expect -a to
produce something more like `uname -mnrs`, because otherwise, I don't
know there's a sane way to extract useful information from it.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: