Subject: bin/9190: netstat(1) doesn't indicate 'B' for the BLACKHOLE flag.
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <ura@hiru.aoba.yokohama.jp>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 01/14/2000 11:36:41
>Number: 9190
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: netstat(1) doesn't indicate 'B' for the BLACKHOLE flag.
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: bin-bug-people (Utility Bug People)
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Jan 14 11:36:00 2000
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: URA Hiroshi
>Organization:
URA Hiroshi E-mail: ura@hiru.aoba.yokohama.jp
>Release: NetBSD-current (1999/12/17)
>Environment:
System: NetBSD uzuki.hiru.aoba.yokohama.jp 1.4P NetBSD 1.4P (UZUKI) #26: Fri Dec 17 18:55:34 JST 1999 root@:/usr/local/src/NetBSD/current/src/sys/arch/sparc/compile/UZUKI sparc
>Description:
According to manual page, netstat(1) indicate 'B' for the BLACKHOLE flag
when the BLACKHOLE flag is set in route. But, netstat(1) doesn't indicate.
>How-To-Repeat:
type the following command.
# route add -net 192.168.0.0 -netmask 255.255.0.0 127.0.0.1 -blackhole
and see results of following commands.
# netstat -rn -f inet | grep 192.168
>Fix:
Apply this patch.
Index: route.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/netbsd/basesrc/usr.bin/netstat/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -u -r1.45 route.c
--- route.c 2000/01/07 04:49:11 1.45
+++ route.c 2000/01/14 18:45:55
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
{ RTF_GATEWAY, 'G' },
{ RTF_HOST, 'H' },
{ RTF_REJECT, 'R' },
+ { RTF_BLACKHOLE, 'B' },
{ RTF_DYNAMIC, 'D' },
{ RTF_MODIFIED, 'M' },
{ RTF_DONE, 'd' }, /* Completed -- for routing messages only */
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: