> >We don't have to provide dlopen()-less library for dynamically linked
> >binaries for same reason.
> 
> 	again, if we ship libnolocale.a for statically linked binaries,

Even if we ship libnolocale.a, the library is stopgap, and will be
removed when dlopen(3) is available on static binaries.

> 	people can use it for dynamically linked binary as well!

There is no reason to do so, when dlopen(3) is available on static
binaries, as I repeatedly said.
--
soda