Subject: install/16746: stdc++ should be in base not comp
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <chris@paradox.demon.co.uk>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 05/10/2002 22:22:40
>Number: 16746
>Category: install
>Synopsis: any c++ program that links to libstdc++.so will fail without the comp set installed
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible: install-manager
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri May 10 13:23:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Chris Gilbert
>Release: NetBSD 1.5ZC
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD whiskas 1.5ZC NetBSD 1.5ZC (GENERIC_LAPTOP) #4: Tue May 7 00:45:01 BST 2002 chris@pinky.paradox.demon.co.uk:/usr/obj/extra/cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC_LAPTOP i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
If I install a package that is written in C++ onto a -current machine without comp installed it fails to run. This is due to libstdc++ being installed by comp and not base.
>How-To-Repeat:
compile kde2 on a different machine, install it on a machine without comp installed log files show:
Shared object "libstdc++.so.4" not found
>Fix:
move libstdc++.so into the base install. I would do it myself but wanted a second opinion on how sane this is.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: