On 05/19 15:43, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> What about "mozilla-firebird" as the name?
> 
> See http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/branding.html and
> http://firebird.sourceforge.net/

I wasn't considering the actual reason that these need to be changed. I
just thought that "firebird" would be less confusing for users, because
it would not seem as if it were an addition to mozilla, such as a
plugin. But you're right, firebird is not the right package name. It is
built as MozillaFirebird, but I think we have an implicit policy that
goes against package names like that, and so mozilla-firebird or
mozilla_firebird would probably be the best choice.