Subject: misc/23400: grohtml.{0,1} built/installed, but listed as obsolete
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <jbernard@mines.edu>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/09/2003 13:05:27
>Number: 23400
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: grohtml.{0,1} built/installed, but listed as obsolete
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: misc-bug-people
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sun Nov 09 20:06:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Jim Bernard
>Release: NetBSD 1.6ZE
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD knox 1.6ZE NetBSD 1.6ZE (KNOX-$Revision: 1.3 $) #0: Wed Nov 5 14:47:55 MST 2003 jim@roc:/wd1/var/tmp/compile/sys/arch/i386/compile/KNOX i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
The /etc/postinstall script reports that /usr/share/man/man1/grohtml.1
and /usr/share/man/cat1/grohtml.0 are obsolete (per specification
in usr/src/distrib/sets/lists/text/mi), but these files were freshly
built with the current installation.
>How-To-Repeat:
Build/install userland; note presence of freshly built grohtml.{0,1}.
Run /etc/postinstall (or read /var/db/obsolete/text) and note that
these files are listed as obsolete.
>Fix:
Either change the Makefile(s) not to build/install the files
(usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/ ...), or change the
obsolete list not to include them. FWIW, /usr/bin/grohtml is
no longer installed, so I guess the obsolete list is correct.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: