The following reply was made to PR misc/30175; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
To: apb@cequrux.com
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/30175: (pf)spamd manpages inaccurate and erroneous
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:32:35 +0900

 hi,
 
 > > (assuming that people don't care its name unless it's in base :-)
 > 
 > Please do not make a (pf)spamd package that conflicts with the
 > mail/spamassassin package.
 > 
 > More generally, even if there is no conflict (yet), I wish that packages
 > that installed many executables would use a common prefix to name
 > them all.  Do not have the "foo" package install bin/foo, bin/bar
 > and bin/baz, where bar and baz are things that ordinary users of the
 > foo package will be unlikely to care about, or where the names are
 > likely to conflict with other packages in the future; instead have the
 > "foo" package install bin/foo, bin/foo-bar and bin/foo-baz; or perhaps
 > bin/foo, libexec/foo/bar and libexec/foo/baz.
 
 are you proposing to rename binaries in the most of packages?
 i don't think it belongs to this PR.
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi