Subject: Re: misc/30175: (pf)spamd manpages inaccurate and erroneous
To: None <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org>
From: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 05/16/2005 15:22:09
On Mon, 16 May 2005, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> are you proposing to rename binaries in the most of packages?
> i don't think it belongs to this PR.
I do think that binaries should be renamed in most of the packages,
but I agree that doing so does not belong in this PR.
The name of the (pf)spamd executable does belong in this PR, and I
made the general argument (about other packages) simply to support my
position about how (pf)spamd should be named.
--apb (Alan Barrett)