Subject: Re: port-xen/29887: sysctl kern.consdev coredumps
To: None <port-xen-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/20/2005 22:29:04
The following reply was made to PR port-xen/29887; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>, christos@zoulas.com,
gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, port-xen-maintainer@NetBSD.org,
gnats-admin@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org,
tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-xen/29887: sysctl kern.consdev coredumps
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:28:42 -0700
--MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 12:03:33AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:10:55PM -0500, James Chacon wrote:
> > I do agree w. Christos here that if historically our printf has returned
> > (null) here that should probably be the behavior we should continue.
>=20
> I did not say anything about changing printf. But I do hink that our code
> should not rely on this behaviour.
Why? It's our stdio, and it's done this since before there was a NetBSD.=20
Why shouldn't our code make use of features in our printf()?
Take care,
Bill
--MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCt0MaWz+3JHUci9cRAiotAKCAb5T+/yt1AFi0lYjHXeR7hJTtywCbBHfA
X1+tbIrUfwafV/QTagmfh4Y=
=TQCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ--