The following reply was made to PR port-m68k/30924; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
To: cube@cubidou.net
Cc: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org, port-m68k-maintainer@netbsd.org,
	gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-m68k/30924: m68k copyinout_t breakage
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:55:09 +0900

 > > 	- reconsider if copyinout_t is a good idea or not.
 > 
 > That's irrelevant.
 
 well, it's relevant because there is no need to fix it
 if the changes will be backed out. :)
 
 i think it's better to have separate types for in and out,
 at least.
 
 > > 	- restructure headers?
 > 
 > I have two options:
 > 
 >  - put copyinout_t in its own header, and include it when needed
 >  - put copyinout_t in types.h
 > 
 > Tell me which one you prefer.
 
 i read the XXX-cube comment but i'm still not sure
 why it can't be in systm.h.
 
 if it's due to circular dependencies among headers, how about
 fixing them instead?
 eg. move the in-kernel function prototypes including timer_create1
 out of time.h so that they won't be included by "primitive" ones?
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi